Back to feed

Will Gold Fall to $3,100 and Silver to $35? A Data-Driven Answer to the Crash Call

Gold and silver keep sliding despite soft PCE and payrolls data, and targets of $3,100 and $35 are making the rounds; history, flows and central-bank buying argue the scenario is weak.

Imported to Nodesdaily: (UTC+03:00)
Watch on YouTube — 3LTBFBUjmOo
Reading options

Device speech is unavailable in this browser.

Concept lens

Choose a technical term in this view to read its general definition, teaching example and use in the article.

No terms from our glossary were found in this view. The glossary does not cover every term yet.

Safe havens are falling while risk appetite hits records: the Nasdaq sits at new highs and Bitcoin is euphoric, yet gold, silver and bonds closed the week lower. That disconnect frames the frightening question from listeners: could gold slide from its $5,600 January peak all the way to $3,100 , with silver collapsing to $35 ? The host tackles it with data rather than forecasts, and moves the fear somewhere else entirely.

The week's numbers seemed supportive for metals at first glance: core PCE cooled to 3% year over year in August versus 3.3% expected, September payrolls came in at 29,000 against an 84,000 forecast, and unemployment ticked up to 4.2% . Markets now price a 78% chance the Fed holds rates at the October 28 meeting. According to the October 2 jobs report on cnbc.com, traders responded to the soft data by betting the Fed stays on hold in October, while wage growth slipped to its slowest pace since May 2021.

But the expected rally never arrived: despite soft inflation and weak jobs data, metals and bonds kept falling while the Nasdaq printed fresh highs. As reported in the September 30 PCE story on foxbusiness.com, the headline index rose 0.3% on the month and 3.4% on the year, undershooting expectations, yet safe havens saw no buying and risky assets extended their climb.

Where does the $3,100 call come from?

The debate was sparked by commentator Christopher Muellan, a guest on several programs, who argues the gold rally is fizzling out and prices could return to $3,100. Because silver moves harder than gold, a widening gold-silver ratio toward 90 would mechanically deliver $35 silver in that scenario. A fall from the $5,600 January peak to $3,100 means roughly a 45% loss of value.

Has such a fall happened before? Yes: gold lost 71% between 1980 and 1999. That episode rested on massive central-bank selling plus powerful bond demand only halfway through a 40-year bull market in Treasuries. Today's picture is inverted, because central banks have been buying, not selling, since 2010. Central banks bought a combined 51 tonnes of gold in June 2026, according to the June figures published on indexbox.io, with Poland leading at 19 tonnes and China adding 15 tonnes for the 20th straight month.

The $4,000 floor

That buying is holding a live floor under prices: when gold pulled back to $4,000 in June, central banks stepped up purchases and it became the strongest month of official buying since November 2024. Back then every technical gauge pointed to $3,500, yet the floor held. According to the October 2 analysis on kitco.com, gold could not keep its initial post-payrolls bounce and attention has swung back to $4,000 as the support to watch.

What remains is the 2011 template: gold fell 46% from its 2011 peak to the 2015 lows, very likely the pattern behind Muellan's call. But back then equities had already corrected and bottomed, and bonds were in a raging bull market, so gold fought both stocks and bonds for flows. Today stocks sit near highs, bonds are deep in a bear market , and central banks are replacing sold bonds with gold. Friday's price action tells the same story: bonds jumped on the bad jobs print and holders immediately used the bounce to sell.

The technical picture refuses to bless the doomsday call either: on the weekly chart the red support near $4,100 dates back to the March low, and strong demand sits below $4,000 even if that line breaks. On the host's math the worst case is a double bottom around the July lows, with limited downside and open upside. Gareth Soloway's old $3,500 target forms a rock-solid base, while the Warren AI tool puts the floor just under the October 2025 lows at $3,842 .

The silver front

Silver's chart looks harsher but points the same way: the metal has just broken out of a giant cup-and-handle stretching back to the 1980 high and is running its sixth straight year of structural supply deficit . This week the $61 March-low horizontal support broke, opening the risk of a slide toward the July lows, yet the $50 breakout zone stands firm and Warren AI sketches a worst case of $45.40 . Silver has roughly halved from its late-January record near $121 to about $61 on October 1, according to the October outlook guide on moneymagpie.com, with much of the slide accelerating as psychological levels gave way.

The bond market, in the host's reading, is where the real alarm rings: Treasury yields have climbed above the 2023 levels from when banks started failing, and bank stocks are rolling over much as they did in mid-2007. The dollar is pressing the 102 resistance while G7 nations are said to be releasing 100 million barrels of diesel reserves against rising fuel prices. The 10-year yield touched 5.23% intraday, a multi-year high, in the same week the Nasdaq made new highs, according to the October 3 analysis on investing.com, with equity euphoria and bond selling sharing the calendar.

What to actually fear

The conclusion is blunt: what deserves fear is not a metals crash but the stock-and-bond side of portfolios that has not corrected yet, with what the host frames as a debt crisis up to 36 times the 2008 mortgage collapse waiting in the wings. That is why he argues 5% in metals is not enough and the share should approach 20% , describing how he parks rental income in metals against inflation. He closes by telling viewers his channel was demonetized on an unfair call, that he will reapply on December 30, and that the Sunday morning videos will continue unchanged.

Key moments

  1. Rates above the 2023 bank-crisis levels
  2. PCE at 3% and payrolls at 29,000: a soft dataset
  3. Question: gold $3,100, silver $36?
  4. The Muellan call and the 90 gold-silver ratio
  5. The 1980-1999 lesson: why gold fell 71%
  6. June buying and the $4,000 floor
  7. Technicals: $4,100 support, $3,842 AI floor
  8. Silver: $61 broke, $50 in focus
  9. Portfolio lesson: 20% metals, not 5%
  10. Demonetization and the December 30 reapply

AI commentary

"The host dismantles the fear trade with numbers and moves the real risk to the equity-and-bond side of portfolios. The central-bank buying and bond bear-market arguments carry weight, though claims such as the $5,600 peak and diesel reserves need firmer sourcing."

AI assessment

Seen through a technician's lens, the counter-thesis cannot be dismissed: if the trend has turned down and rates stay elevated, metals remain under pressure, and a gold-silver ratio stretching toward 90 makes the $35 target mechanically consistent. Central-bank buying cannot carry prices forever either; support waves such as the 51-tonne June 2026 purchases are temporary, and floors get retested once demand pauses.

Parts of the video also await independent verification: the claim that G7 nations are releasing 100 million barrels of diesel reserves could not be confirmed in independent sources, and the $5,600 January peak figure should be cross-checked against public price archives. The Warren AI tool's methodology is not transparent, and the 102 dollar resistance plus the 2007 bank-stock analogy rest on readings rather than hard thresholds. These gaps are exactly where the strongest rebuttal would come from the technical camp.

The host's own positioning matters too: he is a metals investor and the program carries a bullion-dealer sponsorship, so a bullish tilt is natural. His record of debunking the $300 silver and $3,500 gold calls earned him credibility, but the same optimism could become a blind spot this time. Viewers should remember that solid data or not, the narrator's own wallet is on the table.

The practical takeaway is preparation rather than prediction contests: set alerts at $4,000 gold and $61 and $50 silver, keep three to six months of emergency reserves, and raise the metals share of the portfolio gradually. Avoiding leverage while borrowing costs run this hot, and reviewing concentration on the equity-and-bond side, stands out as the host's most defensible point.

Sources

7 links; 1 of them also cited by 2 other stories. Stories sharing a link do not confirm each other; a source's origin is not inferred from how often it is cited.

gold · silver · fed · treasury yields · central banks · inflation

Follow the topic

Before this story

A short reading order from earlier stories linked to this event by an editor.

Evidence and sources

Review permitted source passages, versions and origins.

KAYNAKLARLA OKU

Bu haberi açalım.

Hesap kontrol ediliyor…