Back to feed

From Hegseth to Inflation: Poll Warnings Before the US Midterms

A fresh CNN data roundup by Harry Enten shows the Trump administration trailing on every front ahead of the midterms — from the defense secretary's standing and support for the Iran war to inflation, pump prices and Latino voter sentiment, with **record-breaking** net negatives across the board.

Imported to Nodesdaily: (UTC+03:00)
Watch on YouTube — -gondFDEOA0
Reading options

Device speech is unavailable in this browser.

Concept lens

Choose a technical term in this view to read its general definition, teaching example and use in the article.

No terms from our glossary were found in this view. The glossary does not cover every term yet.

CNN's latest Enten roundup compresses six weeks of midterm pressure into one segment, stacking polling averages , university surveys and prediction markets side by side. The point is not a single bad number but momentum — many indicators moving the same way. Each section should therefore be read comparatively, not in isolation. The result is a cross-partisan picture that is easy to track from the kitchen table to the Senate map.

A Historic Slide for the Defense Secretary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was at net -9 in January before the Iran war build-up and now sits at net -25 overall. Among independents the drop is steeper, from -20 to -43 , an additional 23-point loss. That is more than double the unpopularity in the general electorate and close to triple. The slide helps explain why House leadership preferred to avoid a floor vote — voting with the administration would mean voting against the public mood.

The historical echo is stark. In October 2006 Donald Rumsfeld hit -25 , the second-lowest ever for a defense secretary amid the Iraq war, before falling to an all-time low after the midterms. Hegseth now matches that -25 line , tying the historical near-bottom. On war support the gap has widened: in September 2006 net support for Iraq was -2 , while net support for the Iran war today is -23 , about 21 points more negative. The secretary's personal standing and war sentiment now sit at a similar negative level.

Foreign-Policy Credibility Erodes

On Russia-Ukraine, Trump held a narrow +2 edge over Kamala Harris on trust in 2024. Today his net approval is -33 overall and -53 among independents , a swing of roughly 35 points . The move from a 24-hour peace promise to the current picture has hardened a promise-not-kept perception. Enten's point is that the erosion has bled from a single file into the broader foreign-policy grade.

The Zelensky comparison sharpens the picture. Trump's net favorability sits at -18 while Zelensky is at +13 , a 31-point gap in Zelensky's favor inside the United States. The overall foreign-policy score has also flipped, from +2 at the start of the second term to -31 now, with independents at -41 — a 33-point negative move. A topic that helped return Trump to the White House in 2024 now offers Democrats a clear attack surface ahead of the midterms.

The Marquette University Law School national survey of September 16, 2026 puts Trump's handling of inflation at net -61 , the lowest ever recorded for any president on that question. A Fox News survey looks a touch softer at -50 , yet that too would be a record for any pre-Trump president. The partisan split is negative everywhere: -95 among Democrats, -74 among independents and -4 among Republicans . In the same Marquette data, approval on inflation is 19% , on the economy 28% , on the Iran war 26% .

Rate expectations have repriced in parallel. Prediction markets put the chance of another Fed hike in December at 71% , up from 27% a month ago, on the view that inflation remains above target. That is the combination the White House least wants: a record-low inflation grade alongside a rising rate outlook. Markets are increasingly pricing a longer tightening path.

From the Kitchen Table to the Ballot Box

Pump prices are the most visible kitchen-table item, and Trump's disapproval on gas has hit 80% , the highest ever recorded — no prior president has reached that level. Google searches for gasoline are up 357% in a month, with a 40-cent monthly rise and the market-implied chance of exceeding $4.80 a gallon jumping from 31% to 61% . Among households earning under $100k, 65% call gas a major problem versus 45% above that line, concentrating the pain inside Trump's own base .

Senate math has moved with it. Market odds for Democrats to retake the Senate rose from 48% to 59% in a week, crossing the critical threshold. For the House, Marquette has Democrats at 54-41 among likely voters and 50-42 among registered voters . With gasoline and inflation both repriced negatively at once, the twin engine that once hurt Democrats now works against Republicans.

On immigration, Latino voters have shifted sharply. In fall 2024 Trump led Harris by +5 among Latinos on immigration trust; today his net approval with Latinos is -39 , a 44-point swing. Overall favorability tells the same story: from +6 in January 2025 to -34 now , a 40-point drop. At the state level, Latino favorability in Florida moved from +17 in November 2024 to -25 now (42 points) , and in Texas from +5 to -34 (39 points) . Those moves help explain why contests that have long been out of reach — a first Democratic Senate win in Texas since 1988 or a first Democratic governor in Florida since 1994 — are back in play .

Visualization: nodesdaily AI
ItemSummary
Hegseth -25From -9 in Jan to -25 now; independents -20 to -43
Inflation -61Record low in Marquette; -50 in Fox still historic
Latino -3944-pt immigration swing; FL 42-pt, TX 39-pt drops

Key moments

  1. Opening: broad disapproval
  2. Hegseth from -9 to -25, -43 among independents
  3. Historical match with Rumsfeld at -25
  4. Iran war -23 vs Iraq -2 in 2006
  5. Russia-Ukraine: -33 overall, -53 independents
  6. Inflation -61 Marquette, -50 Fox
  7. Latino immigration swing of 44 points

AI commentary

"The through-line for me is simple: when the economy and foreign policy sour together, midterm math turns into a cross-partisan backlash."

AI assessment

The numbers are striking, but no single survey should be taken as absolute. Enten's mash-up layers different universes — likely voters, registered voters, adults — and different methods, so Marquette, Fox and prediction markets are not asking the same question. The gap between -61 and -50 therefore also reflects methodology. Even so, the uniformity of direction and the size of the moves point beyond margin-of-error noise.

The fact that war sentiment and the secretary's rating meet at a similar negative level does not prove causation. Hegseth at -25 and Iran-war support at -23 are correlated, yet panel data would be needed to tell which drags which. The distinction matters before the midterms — replacing the messenger may not shift the message if war sentiment holds.

The Latino break is strong nationally, but translation to states is uneven. Florida and Texas samples are smaller and the definition of independents varies by state. Swings of 44, 42 and 39 points are large, yet turnout will decide as much as the topline. The read should be treated as elevated probability, not certainty.

The practical takeaway is a return to kitchen-table framing. When inflation and gasoline press together as a double squeeze , even defense and foreign-policy topics get read through prices. In that environment Republicans are likely to find defense a defensive topic, while Democrats gain more traction talking prices and health — not the metric itself but which issue frames the ballot.

Sources

7 links; no other published story cites them. Stories sharing a link do not confirm each other; a source's origin is not inferred from how often it is cited.

polling · hegseth · inflation · gas prices · latino voters · midterms · prediction markets

Follow the topic

Before this story

A short reading order from earlier stories linked to this event by an editor.

Evidence and sources

Review permitted source passages, versions and origins.

KAYNAKLARLA OKU

Bu haberi açalım.

Hesap kontrol ediliyor…