The video opens with pushback the host says he hears most: 'you only pick the obvious winners, everyone already knows them.' His three-part rebuttal frames the rest of the pitch. First, investing is not a scavenger hunt for obscurity; it is about finding the strongest moats, the fastest earnings growth and the clearest long-run demand, then asking whether price already reflects it. A famous name can still be mispriced. Second, none of these names ripped the day he mentioned them — Micron slipped about 10% at first, Coherent nearly 20%, Microsoft sat around $400 for months — so conviction had to survive weak sentiment and negative headlines before the run. Third, beating an index usually requires concentration; owning everything guarantees the average. Warren Buffett's Apple concentration and Ron Baron's Tesla concentration are offered as precedents: a handful of exceptional businesses drove most of the excess return.
Stock one is Micron, pitched as the next test of the AI memory boom around the September 30 print. The video cites a fiscal Q4 revenue view near $50 billion, an 86% gross margin and about $31 in adjusted EPS, plus 12 straight revenue beats and 13 on earnings. Filed results are far more earthbound: fiscal Q4 2025 revenue was $11.32 billion versus $9.30 billion the prior quarter and $7.75 billion a year earlier, with GAAP gross margin 44.7% and non-GAAP 45.7%, GAAP EPS $2.83 and non-GAAP $3.03. Full-year revenue was a record $37.4 billion. The mix matters: combined revenue from HBM, high-capacity DIMMs and low-power server DRAM topped $10 billion in the quarter, five times the year-ago level, so strength is broad DRAM pricing, not HBM alone. The beat streak directionally checks out, but the exact counter in the video reads like a rounded marketing tally rather than a filed disclosure.
The forward case rests on demand outstripping supply. AI data centers need vast DRAM, NAND and high-bandwidth memory; Micron says it has locked multi-year agreements with committed volumes, pricing protection and customer deposits while industry supply stays tight. New capacity in Taiwan, Idaho and Singapore is slated to contribute through 2027, when management still expects tightness. The balance-sheet kicker is buybacks: only $2.16 billion remains on the current authorization while quarterly free cash flow hit a record $18.3 billion, so a new authorization would signal confidence and mechanically lift EPS. The video floats fiscal 2027 EPS around $157, stretching to $170 on better pricing — numbers that do not square with a memory stock trading in the low hundreds. At a $150-300 share price, $150+ in EPS would imply a 1-2x P/E; the more grounded way to read it is price-target confusion. The real leverage is simpler: if gross margin holds above 50% on higher volume, earnings compound fast; if pricing normalizes, they reverse just as fast. That cyclicality is the core risk, alongside Taiwan labor and eventual price normalization.
Stock two is Coherent, which sells the optics that let AI clusters actually move data — transceivers, lasers and photonics that sit between servers, accelerators and networks. GPUs compute, but without high-speed optics the system cannot scale. Fiscal 2025 shows the inflection: revenue $5.81 billion, up 23% year over year, GAAP gross margin 35.2% (+424 bps) and non-GAAP 37.9% (+358 bps), GAAP loss $0.52 improving by $1.32 and non-GAAP EPS $3.53 up $2.32. The video highlights a recent quarter at $2.05 billion, up 42% year over year, with data-center products at roughly 79% of revenue and non-GAAP margin at a record 40.2% (+215 bps), with gross profit up 41% in tandem. Even if the quarterly dollar figure annualizes high versus the $5.81 billion full year, the margin trajectory is corroborated: profit growing with revenue points to mix, pricing and operating leverage, not growth bought at any price. With hyperscalers spending hundreds of billions on data centers, each new cluster needs more optical connections as compute rises.
Valuation is the contested middle. The video puts Coherent near 21 times forward earnings and points to fiscal 2028 EPS around $13.96. Against record revenue, expanding margins and an order book stretching into calendar 2028, that multiple does not look stretched for a hardware backbone name — provided spending holds. The risk list is straightforward: a pause in hyperscaler capex, tighter AI regulation, aggressive competition, or margins slipping back below 40% would undercut the thesis. The recent pullback, the host argues, was fear about AI investment rather than business deterioration, which the last two quarters' revenue and margin trends support. Still, optics is among the first places price pressure shows up, and a single soft quarter can reprice a hardware multiple quickly. The larger opportunity, if buildouts continue, is simply more clusters needing more fast connections.
Stock three is Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI), the small-cap torque play. The pitch is that demand for 800G and next-generation 1.6T transceivers runs 20% to 40% above available capacity and will stay that way through mid-2027. The video cites Q2 revenue $191.9 million (+86% year over year, +27% sequentially), data-center up 140%, Q3 guided $255-290 million and $1.1 billion for 2026. Filed numbers are smaller but directionally similar: Q2 2025 GAAP revenue $103.0 million versus $43.3 million a year earlier and $99.9 million the prior quarter, GAAP gross margin 30.3% versus 22.1% a year earlier. Management's Q3 outlook is $115-127 million revenue with non-GAAP gross margin 29.5-31%, roughly half the video's range. The strategic edge claimed is vertical integration: AAOI makes lasers in-house rather than relying on merchant suppliers, which could protect supply and lift margins as lasers become the industry bottleneck, with some future laser products eyed above 50% gross margin.
Capacity is where the story will be won or lost. The video describes monthly high-speed output beginning near 100k units as Q1 closed, climbing past 650k by December and roughly 930k through 2027, alongside a backlog above $200 million for 1.6T gear from one major cloud buyer. If utilization and mix expand together, the earnings leverage is explosive — estimates cited imply about 21 times two-year earnings and roughly 11 times three-year earnings, so today's optically high near-term multiple could look cheap in hindsight. The flip side is concentration and capital: the 10 largest customers account for 99% of sales, expansion demands heavy capex, and any new financing could dilute. A factory delay or a single large order shift would hit the top line immediately. Demand is no longer the open question; execution is. Turning backlog and new lines into profitable 1.6T shipments is the whole thesis.
Together the three names are different layers of the same bottleneck — Micron in memory, Coherent in connectivity, AAOI in transceivers and lasers. The video's headline that long-term holders could be made millionaires in two to three years implies roughly 25-35% compounded annually and the discipline to sit through drawdowns like the 10% and 20% dips already seen, while the portfolio beats benchmarks. That patience was rewarded when sentiment was weak; it will be tested again if the cycle turns. The near-term checkpoints are concrete: Micron's September 30 call for Q1 guidance, gross-margin and capacity schedules and any expansion of the buyback; for Coherent and AAOI, whether margins hold above 40% and 30% respectively and whether capacity actually ships. Until execution proves out, an obvious winner remains just an obvious candidate.
AI commentary
"My take: obvious does not mean automatically expensive — or automatically cheap. Micron and Coherent face peak-cycle pricing risk if memory or optics demand cools, while AAOI's leverage lives or dies on scaling a tiny factory to hyperscaler scale. All three will be judged not on demand quotes but on execution."
AI assessment
Steel-man the pushback at its strongest: obvious winners are often already priced, and a low forward P/E can signal a cyclical peak, not a bargain. In capital-intensive memory, Micron's profits come from a supply-demand spread, not IP margins; even the CNBC note that Micron screens as the third-cheapest in the S&P 500 frames that cheapness as the market pricing a top. In optics, competition is fierce and a pause in hyperscaler capex hits connectivity budgets first. At AAOI's scale, 99% customer concentration means a single order push flows straight to revenue and cash. One macro slowdown could trigger all three at once.
Methodology is the thinnest part of the video. Several figures do not reconcile with filings: Micron's $50 billion, 86% margin and $31 EPS and AAOI's $191.9 million and $255-290 million ranges sit well above the filed $11.32 billion, 45.7%, $3.03 and $103.0 million with a $115-127 million outlook. The 12-13 quarter beat streak and the $157-170 fiscal 2027 EPS talk are not sourced; the earnings decks and SEC exhibits are more tempered and range-bound. Untested scenarios get a passing mention: if DRAM pricing normalizes, if HBM supply ramps faster, or if Taiwan faces labor disruption, margin and volume retrace as fast as they expanded, yet the video moves past that headwind in a sentence.
Incentives and verifiability matter. A bold 'millionaire in 2-3 years' headline drives views, while memory cycles and optics demand need independent checks. What does verify cleanly is the core mix shift: Micron's HBM plus high-capacity DIMMs and server DRAM topping $10 billion in a quarter, Coherent's $5.81 billion fiscal year with 37.9% non-GAAP margin, AAOI's 30.3% GAAP margin on $103 million. What remains single-sourced is the forward edge: deposits and pricing protection in multi-year deals, fiscal 2028 EPS near $13.96 for Coherent, and over $200 million of 1.6T orders for AAOI are management commentary. Independent confirmation would be customer commitment footnotes, quarterly capacity commissioning updates, and a breakout of optics within hyperscaler capex guidance.
The practical filter is therefore narrow. The trio fits investors with high risk tolerance who can hold 2-3 years without trading the dip and who can re-underwrite the thesis through 10-20% drawdowns — especially those who believe AI capex stays elevated and who are comfortable owning cyclicals through the cycle. It does not fit those seeking dividends, low volatility, or dilution aversion, or those uncomfortable with single-customer concentration and Taiwan supply-chain exposure. The watchlist is short: Micron's September 30 guidance and whether gross margin holds above 50%, Coherent holding above 40%, AAOI converting a ramp from 650k to 930k units per month into shipments at 30%+ margin. If those thresholds hold, the story extends; if one breaks, 'obvious' quickly reprices to 'expensive.'
Sources
7 links; no other published story cites them. Stories sharing a link do not confirm each other; a source's origin is not inferred from how often it is cited.
- @youtube.com YouTube — Millionaires Investment Secrets Episode
- @investors.micron.com https://investors.micron.com/news/press-release/2025/Micron-Technology-Inc--Reports-Results-for-the-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-of-Fiscal-2025-09-23-2025/default.aspx
- @sec.gov https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/723125/000072312525000024/a2025q4ex991-pressrelease.htm
- @coherent.com https://www.coherent.com/news/press-releases/fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-results
- @investors.ao-inc.com https://investors.ao-inc.com/news-releases/news-release-details/applied-optoelectronics-reports-second-quarter-2025-results
- @cnbc.com https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/31/why-is-micron-so-cheap-ai-rally-leader-has-the-third-lowest-valuation-in-the-sp-500.html
- @stocktitan.net https://www.stocktitan.net/news/AAOI/applied-optoelectronics-reports-second-quarter-2025-devre33t378r.html
micron · coherent · applied optoelectronics · ai infrastructure · stock market · earnings · hbm