Carlin says that screening Asian stocks makes Xiaomi impossible to ignore. The company spans smartphones, AI-powered IoT devices, and electric vehicles. Yet the stock trades about 50% below its peak. That gap is the starting point of the video.

Operationally, the picture looks solid at first glance. Xiaomi ranks between second and fourth in the global smartphone market and has lifted its average selling price by roughly 25%. But soaring memory-chip prices are eating into margins. Management says 2026 memory supply is secured, yet part of the extra cost has already been passed into prices.

The most striking part of the video is the scale of investment: Xiaomi is allocating around RMB 40 billion, roughly 6 billion dollars, to AI and new ventures. Carlin stresses this is Tesla-scale spending for an Asian company. The business-model resemblance helps: hardware, software, vehicles, and robotics under one roof. Xiaomi's market value, meanwhile, sits near 32 billion dollars.

From there he moves to the Tesla comparison, deliberately over the top: at Tesla's multiples — a 1.1 trillion dollar valuation — Xiaomi would be worth 3 to 5 trillion. He even teases Elon Musk: buy the company for 40 billion, reprice it at 3 trillion, pocket the difference. Jokes aside, the message is serious: the market prices the same story at two opposite extremes.

On AI, Carlin makes a gloomy point: everyone has an AI agent, competition is heating up, and a price war is coming. In his view, AI will change our lives, but returns on investment will be poor. So this is not a technology bubble but an investment bubble. That Xiaomi labors for profitability at a 30-billion-dollar revenue scale while players far below that scale command multi-billion valuations strikes him as confirmation.

The hardware front is mixed: the global user base keeps growing, and tablets and wearables are doing well. Still, Carlin is blunt: however hard it tries, Xiaomi is not Apple. For a maker unable to command premium prices, commoditized products mean margin pressure. The slide in smartphone revenue confirms it.

Electric vehicles are the bright spot of the story: the SU7 sedan passed 500,000 cumulative deliveries, and the total reached 760,000 including the YU7 SUV. More than 30,000 vehicles were delivered in April, and the SU7 led China's pure-electric segment above 200,000 yuan in the first half. But there is another side: the EV unit posted another quarterly loss in Q2 2026. Carlin adds a note from the used market: 25% value loss after one year of full-electric ownership, 50% on three-year-old low-mileage cars. The real value opportunity, he hints, may sit on the used lot rather than in the showroom.

The financials feed the video's cautious tone: the first revenue decline after years of growth, and a sharp drop in net income. First-quarter 2026 profit fell 43% under memory costs. Smartphone gross margin slid to 8.5% in Q2. The company is buying back shares while also issuing new ones to fund AI bets. Carlin likes the buybacks, not the dilution. A P/E of 19 looks fair to him, not a bargain. He reckons one normalizing quarter could lift that ratio to 25.

The Apple comparison delivers the value-investing lesson: Apple trades at a P/E of 36, Xiaomi at 19. Carlin recalls recommending Apple at a P/E of 9 back in 2016; later stock splits changed the price, but the lesson stands: even great companies occasionally trade at single-digit multiples. Tencent sits near 15, Prosus near 9. So there is no need to hurry; the patient investor always gets another chance.

The closing section reviews analyst expectations: houses such as DBS model a pause year followed by 20% growth, attach a forward P/E of 25, and say buy. The broader consensus also leans buy, with the average target implying more than 40% upside. Carlin treats this with caution: such scenarios work until a real crisis hits. If Asia suffers a sharp shakeout, he will go hunting at single-digit multiples. Until then the plan is clear: watch from the sidelines and buy realized cash flows, not promises.

First, the bull case in its strongest form: Xiaomi may be an early entry into a scaling ecosystem rather than a value trap. The SU7 led China's pure-electric segment above 200,000 yuan in the first half; April deliveries jumped 50% month on month toward 760,000 total units. Consensus leans buy, with the average target implying over 40% upside. If the EV unit turns profitable at scale and memory costs ease, a P/E of 19 could look cheap in hindsight.

But three questions go untested in the video. First, whether the memory-cost shock is structural: a 12 GB RAM plus 512 GB storage phone now carries about 1,500 yuan in extra cost, already passed into mid-range prices. Second, the EV unit's renewed Q2 2026 loss and the execution risks of capacity expansion. Third, how steep used-EV depreciation feeds back into new-car demand. Without answers here, the picture stays incomplete.

Then I look at whose expectations these are. Sell-side targets, DBS included, rest on automatic 20% growth after a pause year. Delivery counts and gross margins can be tracked against public data, but a forward P/E of 25 is a belief, not a measurement. At decision time I would anchor on realized margins and adjusted net profit, not on that assumption.

My verdict: Xiaomi is worth watching for the long-horizon investor who believes in the EV and ecosystem story and can stomach sharp swings. For the disciplined value buyer, today's price is not a buy signal but a waiting sign. I put money into cash flows I can buy at a low multiple, not into promises; until that day arrives, I stay on the sidelines.

AI commentary

"What stuck with me from this analysis is a single rule: buy realized cash flows, not promises. Xiaomi's story sounds exciting, but Carlin's sideline discipline recalls the more expensive lesson: everything that looks cheap is not cheap."

AI assessment

First, the bull case in its strongest form: Xiaomi may be an early entry into a scaling ecosystem rather than a value trap. The SU7 led China's pure-electric segment above 200,000 yuan in the first half; April deliveries jumped 50% month on month toward 760,000 total units. Consensus leans buy, with the average target implying over 40% upside. If the EV unit turns profitable at scale and memory costs ease, a P/E of 19 could look cheap in hindsight.

But three questions go untested in the video. First, whether the memory-cost shock is structural: a 12 GB RAM plus 512 GB storage phone now carries about 1,500 yuan in extra cost, already passed into mid-range prices. Second, the EV unit's renewed Q2 2026 loss and the execution risks of capacity expansion. Third, how steep used-EV depreciation feeds back into new-car demand. Without answers here, the picture stays incomplete.

Then I look at whose expectations these are. Sell-side targets, DBS included, rest on automatic 20% growth after a pause year. Delivery counts and gross margins can be tracked against public data, but a forward P/E of 25 is a belief, not a measurement. At decision time I would anchor on realized margins and adjusted net profit, not on that assumption.

My verdict: Xiaomi is worth watching for the long-horizon investor who believes in the EV and ecosystem story and can stomach sharp swings. For the disciplined value buyer, today's price is not a buy signal but a waiting sign. I put money into cash flows I can buy at a low multiple, not into promises; until that day arrives, I stay on the sidelines.

Sources

xiaomi · stock market · electric vehicles · smartphones · value investing · nodesdaily